Common Spaces but Not a Common Community

Disapproval in government is downright pathetic.   Congress’ approval rating, according to the Gallup poll, is hovering around 10 percent.

Additionally, the Supreme Court is now being hit with political disdain. Typically, the Court has been shy of political disapproval.

I am not sure what the cause is.  Is it genuine disapproval of policies in these institutions or is it more about mistrust?  The latter is the troubling component.  If the United States holds the concept of “government of the people, by the people, and for people,” it would seem detrimental to say that we do not trust it.  If we do not trust it, it would be sufficient to say that we do not trust ourselves.

I hope this statement is false.  However, there are some troubling trends that our healthy dose of skepticism is becoming complete malevolent, dysfunctional paranoia. [See pictures 1, 2, 3]

Before you read on, read this article from Robert D. Putnam titled Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.  He discusses the erosion of civic engagement and civic trust and he does a wonderful job, but I want to expose an element of the gun control debate that has not been identified yet.  Culture, independence, personal responsibility, and safety are all the current philosophical principles that are at the heart of the gun control debate.

[An early entry to this blog discussed the events of mass shootings so I will not go into how we should evaluate those events here.]  Liberals and moderates have reasonable arguments such as preventing extended magazines and limiting sells of assault weapons (if only we could define assault weapon), but this debate is an extension of the inherit mistrust we have of our fellow citizens.  Liberals calling for gun control measures is the lesser expression of mistrust.  It is out of sight, out of mind trick.  There is something more ruthless about arming teachers, co-workers, and posting packed guards in strategic areas.

I do not mean ruthless in the sense of disapproval, but of the vibrant expression of mistrust. 

I see it as another troubling trend of an abstract, dark, and destructive force that erodes the concept of a community, civic trust, and a government of the people by and for the people.  This force is replacing the concept of common community with common spaces, from civic trust to mistrust, and a government that is increasingly abstract, misunderstood, and beyond the reaches for its average citizens.  This troubles me deeply.

On these topics, I fear the fear itself.

I want our government and citizens to debate the solutions to gun control/ gun rights on different grounds and that can be applied to every other conceivable area.

What can we do as a nation to maximize the greatest trust and civic engagement without contributing to greater political polarization or abolishing a healthy dose of caution?

The answer is not legislative or political, but juxtaposition with community and civic reform. This reform must start with self-discipline and a self determined action to get involved with the people you share a common, yet short, journey with.  With these actions a more actively engaged community, states, and country will become reality.  We can build and strengthen understanding and unanimity in addition, recognize individuals that are insincere and mentally ill.

Otherwise our current practices will spur more polarization, misunderstanding, gridlock, and mistrust that becomes more common and beastly.


About Logan

Logan lives in Arkansas
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Common Spaces but Not a Common Community

  1. Nice post. We have strayed too far from the idea that community can be a good thing. I do hope that we as a nation can start a real conversation that will make us realize we’re all in this thing together.

  2. Derrick says:

    You’re talking about a change in culture, which is much harder to effect than the way we usually fix problems here in the US. We want to fix all of our problems legislatively. Pass a law and the duty is done.

    Suggestions for changing a culture?

  3. Logan says:

    I’ll do a follow up to answer that question, but I can give you two journal articles that show my coming thesis. I doubt it is a problem of culture. I think it is an education problem. As Dr. Rogers says, “America does generally take a minimalist approach to formalized civic education leaving the civic education of U.S. citizens as a whole too much to informal socialization processes
    and chance.” This lack of education, I think, demonstrates the misunderstands, ignorance, and frustration with our political process. If the average American was better informed, perhaps then, we could have an honest debate about the actual limitations of the state and the individual, because right now– it’s a pony show abomination.

    Paper 1
    Paper 2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s